Skip to main content

What a Future with Flying Cars Might Look Like

Jetsons Style Flying Car - Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
Jetsons Style Flying Car - Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
Regular readers of this blog will know that flying cars have been a recurring subject over the years. I even collected all my posts into a book you can buy on Amazon Kindle called Where's My Flying Car?

The development of a true flying car is a fanciful one, largely because we've yet to come up with anything that actually looks like a car that flies. 

Most serious projects that even make it to a prototype are either small planes that compact into something you might drive from your home to an airport (if they don't have any vertical landing and take off (VTOL) capability) but you wouldn't drive to you local supermarket for the weekly groceries run, or they're some kind of drone/helicopter configuration with so many propellers you'll worry about shredding pedestrians who get too close.

The dream is something that looks exactly like a car but can drive on a road, or hover (kind of like Luke Skywalker's Landspeeder in Star Wars), and ultimately hover and fly around at any altitude.

Let's just say someone cracks it. How would a future with flying cars actually work?


It'll Be CHAOS!!! (Will it though?)

Flying Car Traffic Chaos - Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
Flying Car Traffic Chaos. Maybe we
don't want to fly too close to each other!
 - Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
One argument against flying cars is that people imagine you'll be able to fly anywhere in much the same way you can drive a regular car anywhere... but with altitude. 

We all know someone who shouldn't be allowed to drive even regular ground based vehicles. The thought of them driving four or five stories above street level is terrifying. You know the type. They think they're amazing drivers. That's why things like speed limits, road rules, and generally being a nice person behind the wheel don't apply to them.

Then there's the issue of what happens when a flying car runs out of fuel mid trip? Are they going to just drop out of the sky? We've all run out of fuel in our regular vehicle at some point, so you know it's going to happen five stories above street level.

Obviously a single flying car in an urban environment has a lot of safety issues to overcome. Even more so if we are to get to the point where our main ride is a flying car. This is why a flying car needs to be able to hover in place at any altitude. Speed cannot be a factor for keeping it in the air. Its default state in the air has to be to hover in place.


Amateur Futurist Says It Will Not Be Chaos

Sixties Retro Style Flying Cars look kind of cool! - Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
Sixties Retro Style Flying Cars look kind of cool!
- Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
The way my mind works is, I can see how an entire system might work in an instant,  based on no actual research or study just whatever knowledge happens to be rattling around my head at the time.

I was taking a morning shower, listening to various podcasts, as I do. On one of them (episode 27 of Batman on Film's Batmanimation podcast), one of the hosts mentioned the exact scenario of flying cars just falling out of the sky as a reason to not want them around.

This triggered my thoughts into overdrive because I really want to see actual flying cars, like we were promised in the movies, in my lifetime.

In the future the chance of a flying car just falling out of the sky will be minimal (never say never right?). In fact flying cars will likely be safer than the regular ground based vehicles we drive now.


My Vision for How a Future with Flying Cars Might Look

Disclaimer: I'm not going to claim any of this as if I'm the first person to have these ideas. All I'll say is I did no research into this until after I wrote all this down. The actual research papers, by actual futurists I found were so long, dry and boring I was tempted to copy them into ChatGPT just to get a short, dry and boring summary... don't believe me... Here's one - The Flying Car—Challenges and Strategies Toward Future Adoption. Here's another one that likely contains some of the concepts I'm about to share - Flying Car Transportation System: Advances, Techniques, and Challenges. Needless to say I got bored at the thought of copying them into ChatGPT, so I didn't do that!

Anyway...

There are two ways a flying car network could go with the end version likely to be a hybrid. The first is fully autonomous flying cars that fly safe, predictable routes, much like public transport. So much so that you don't own a flying car yourself, or if you do, you never fly it manually.

The second way is semi autonomous flying cars. In this scenario the car is responsible for all safety features like not crashing into anything and making sure the vehicle lands well before it runs out of fuel or power but the driver can drive it anywhere under their own control.

There is no version of a flying car where you have full control of all systems. That would be too unsafe and dangerous in urban environments.


It Starts with a Network

Sixties Retro Style Flying Mini-Bus perhaps? - Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
Sixties Retro Style Flying Mini-Bus perhaps?
- Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
Every region would have a virtual street map of flying car 'roads'. These maps would consist of your traditional ground level streets that cars of any type still drive upon with full manual control just like we do now.

Above this map would be flying car road levels defined by altitude. For simplicity's sake let's say road level one is ten feet, road level two is 20 feet, three is 30 feet etc. to whatever altitude is needed to allow free traffic flow through each region. Less busy regions may only have level one altitude roads while really busy roads could have five to ten altitude levels.

The purpose of these levels is to create predictable routes of traffic flow rather than letting everyone fly around randomly at any level. You will be able to change levels during your journey much like you would change lanes on the freeway. More on that later.

Flying car roads will be monitored in real time using existing mobile/internet phone networks to collect data from local regions. Data would be passed to the network from vehicles in the region and vice versa.


How Cars Use the Network

Personal flying cars are semi autonomous. The network does not control their movement but it does track them and can disable a vehicle's movement if it deviates from the road system. i.e. force the vehicle into a hover or even land if it enters a no fly zone (or just not allow a vehicle to enter a no fly zone to begin with).

A more modern flying car with Tesla stylings - Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
A more modern flying car with Tesla stylings.
- Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
Vehicles themselves would always connect to the network when started up so they could collect data on local traffic flow and calculate an efficient route to wherever you wish to go. They would only download updated maps of the immediate section they're in and sections you intend to travel through rather than the whole network to save time.

Flying your car in urban environments would be mostly controlled by the car's AI which would constantly scan its immediate environment to avoid collisions and keep the vehicle on route. It would also be talking to the network, comparing its data on where vehicles on the network are reporting they are with what it is actually is seeing. Giving each vehicle at least two points of data to work with.

The human driver's main role is to stop and start the vehicle - as well as to determine the destination of travel (obviously). While the driver can stop and start the vehicle at any time the vehicle's AI will work to make sure this happens safely. You won't be able to come to a dead stop on a busy road level (five stories up). 


Going to the Countryside

A Retro Sixties car stacked on another Retro Sixties Car 'Flying' on the highway. - Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
A Retro Sixties car stacked on another Retro Sixties Car
'Flying' on the highway. That top car had to be 'flying'
at some point, right? I got so many images like this
from Leonardo.ai where its idea of a flying car
is just one car on top of another?
- Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
What's the point of having a car if you can't go on a road trip, or even off road altogether?

While the flying car network will likely mirror existing road systems, so you'll be able to connect wherever the network has coverage, you will sometimes need to travel 'off line'. Both technically and literally you'll be off roading.

Out of urban environments you'll have a lot more freedom to move around as you please. Your car will still handle all the necessary systems to keep you safe and prevent you from falling out of the sky but otherwise you'll have the most control of your vehicle you can have without a pilots license. 


Flying Cars - Easier to Drive Than Today's Cars

If you've read this far you'll be getting the sense that actually flying a flying car, particularly in an urban environment, will require next to no effort if you're just going from A to B and making no unscheduled stops along the way.

In many ways the flying experience will be positively boring so you'll want to fill your time with either something fun, relaxing, or productive.

But how different is that from how we drive now? 

I recently started driving again after several years of never needing to drive anywhere. As a passenger I usually just sit back and listen to the radio or talk a little with the driver (usually my partner, who I see a lot, so driving isn't exactly a catch up on all the gossip experience).

As a driver of an automatic (gearbox) vehicle I'm basically in charge of starting and stopping the car - and of course overall safety, not crashing, and trying not to be crashed into. It's not a particularly exciting role. To be honest I prefer driving manual gearbox cars just because there's a little more to do.

Aside from the independence driving affords I never really missed not driving myself. As a passenger I'm already conditioned for the flying car experience and I'll have independence without really needing anyone to drive me anywhere - since the car can do that itself.


We Still Need to Invent the Flying Car!

If you're doing star jumps on the roof of your flying car you may need some pointers on safety. - Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
If you're doing star jumps on the roof of your flying car
you may need some pointers on safety.
- Image by TET & Leonardo.ai
While I think I've made the case for how safe (and possibly a little boring) flying cars will be we still haven't invented a flying car that even remotely looks like your average daily driver that you'd fly to the supermarket.

While quadcopter style drones are the closest tech we have to something that could have a default mode of hovering in mid air, they're noisy, have too big of a footprint (or too small a space for a family of at least four), and there's a very real concern you could accidently start blending pedestrians in a busy urban setting.

One day someone may invent an actual anti-gravity drive - which is basically the pseudo science tech that most Sci-Fi movies are using to explain how everything from a speeder bike to a Starship Destroyer (if we use Star Wars as an analogy) can just float in mid air, within the atmosphere of a planet with Earth like gravity.

Until then, at least I hope I've given you some insight into how and why flying cars won't actually be dangerous and chaotic, and that they are a technology to look forward to... someday.

Comments

Buy Gifts and Apparel featuring art by TET.

Popular posts from this blog

I'm Confused About Why People Prefer to Say Discombobulated?

D iscombobulated. Is a word that I think someone rediscovered about three or four years ago (maybe more because the pandemic years have thrown out my sense of time) and now I hear it a lot. It's not a new word by any means, but when I started hearing multiple celebrities using it in everyday sentences, I actively had to look up what it meant. Define it with as many synonyms as you like but essentially it's just another word meaning 'confused'. Seinfeld Quotes: Quotes.net The words are pretty much interchangeable. He was discombobulated by too many choices. He was confused by too many choices.  My confusion is the length of the word. It's unnecessarily long with too many syllables. There are many other words that mean confused, and therefore also mean discombobulated. Most of them are shorter and easier to say. So why not just say 'confused'? Perhaps discombobulated sounds more intelligent, maybe?  Hawaii Five-0 Quotes: Quotes.net I've noticed it gets us...

Social Media: It's All Fake News - Even That News You Shared, That Proves the Thing, Because It's Backed Up By a Credible Expert, is Fake.

Social Media profiles need a peer based rating system that locks you out for 30 days if your feed is one long stream of depressing boredom that bums everyone out. I  don't watch or read the news anymore (mainstream or otherwise). From time to time, if something filters through that piques my interest, I'll take a bit of a dive to find out more. The recent US election is a good example. I even wrote a few opinion pieces in this blog. The Daily Show Is Not News Note that I don't count The Daily Show as news, because I did watch quite a lot of that during the US election. While they lean quite a bit toward the left overall, it's not a show you look to for context, since much of their humor is based on reframing context to get a laugh. The one thing The Daily Show does well is highlight how both Liberal and Right wing media latch onto one or two bullet point messages each day and run them through the mouths of every on screen commentator like they're all wind up parro...

TV Series Review: The Penguin (2024) *No Spoilers*

W hile we wait for an eternity (well an eternity in movie fan years anyway) for The Batman Part 2 , sequel to Matt Reeves acclaimed, The Batman  (2022), we have, what is essentially a direct sequel with  The Penguin , a limited. eight episode, TV Series set within a week or two of the end of the first film. Unfortunately it's a direct sequel to Colin Farrell's Penguin rather than Robert Pattinson's, Bruce Wayne/Batman. Fortunately that's the only real disappointment I have with this series.   Right from the first episode The Penguin establishes itself as a show for grown ups who enjoy actual character development, that hooks you in, is thought provoking, and raises questions that you expect will be answered as the story unfolds. After the events of The Batman, there is something of a power vacuum left in Gotham's crime world that Oswald 'Oz' Cobb a.k.a. The Penguin, sets out to fill using his experience, quick thinking, and his ability to hustle his way into...

Movie Review: The Fall Guy (2024) *Minor Spoilers*

W hen I initially heard they were making a movie version of the TV series, The Fall Guy (1981-86) , I was definitely interested, as a person who tuned in to that series, weekly, when it originally aired. I had intended to see The Fall Guy in the cinema but, for whatever reason, didn't get there, and didn't prioritize seeing the film as the reviews, and more importantly, general information about the movie came out. Specifically, The Fall Guy makes no effort to capture whatever magic it was the TV show had that made it the show it was. A fact that is driven home by the reworked TV series theme song, played over the end credits and behind the scenes footage of stunts in the film, that removes all references to real world actors and replaces iconic line of "I'm the unknown stuntman who made Redford such a star" with the nonsensical "I'm the unknown stuntman who tries to win your heart." - sure... I guess... I mean, the original song is about never gett...

Movie Review: Memory (2023)

S omething a little different for me in terms of movies I usually review,  Memory  is a film I was invited along to see by my partner, and both of us didn't know much about the movie going in, other than it was a film where one of the leads has dementia. The basic premise follows adult, special needs social worker, Sylvia (Jessica Chastain), who leads a simple and structured life. When Saul (Peter Sarsgaard) follows her home from their high school reunion the surprise encounter profoundly impacts both of their lives. The film starts out very awkward and disjointed to some degree, which I feel is intentional, to reflect that Sylvia, who is also a struggling single mother, is fairly resilient, she is, in many ways, just barely holding everything together because she doesn't have any other option. When Saul sees Sylvia at their high school reunion it seems like some unpleasant memories from her past are fast tracked into the forefront of her life, and things move forward fro...

Boom Crash Opera Born Classic But Not Again

Boom Crash Opera are an Australian Band that reached the peak of their popularity in the mid to late nineteen eighties. They are a band that I knew about at that time but was never really excited by until they released their ill fated double album Born and Born Again in 1995 (Album cover pictured). At the time of its release I was very much into emerging Australian musical acts and was also looking out for new sounds that were different and had kind of a futuristic/electronic sound. Artists that I was buying at the time included; Swoop , Nine Inch Nails and Pop Will Eat Its Self . As well as a really interesting release by David Bowie, the concept album, Outside . Born was a fairly radical departure for Boom Crash Opera (BCO). The first single, Gimme , was often compared to the sounds of Gary Glitter, particularly his single, Rock n Roll part 2 , because of the pounding drum loops. Watch the video below. My favorite single from the album is dissemble which probably went now...

Movie Opinion: Love Actually (2003) Actually has Aged Just As It Should

S creen Rant ran an article by Bisma Fida , Love Actually: The 8 Storylines That Aged Badly, Ranked  (Published Dec 10, 2021), which obviously was regurgitated into one of my newsfeeds because  Love Actually (2003) is still one of the best Christmas movies ever made, that's why it's still topical in 2024. Bisma, who completely failed to get their profile page pro-nouns in order. Something that should be a priority for anyone commenting on what is accepted by modern audiences, who are all completely comfortable accepting preferred pro-nouns without question, because we're just that enlightened in 2024. F**K Screen Rant Full disclosure, I hate Screen Rant to the point that, if I do click on their click bait titles because I didn't see it was a Screen Rant story, I'll close the browser window almost immediately once I see what it is (which is why I'm not providing any links to their homepage). It's not because I dislike their articles. I would actually like to...