Skip to main content

70% of Voters Didn't Vote for a Labor Government - Misrepresenting a Statistic | Australian Federal Election 2022

Caricature of Anthony Albanese - Australia's 31st Prime Minister
Anthony Albanese - Australia's 31st Prime Minister

In the aftermath of the Australian Federal Election, in which the Australian Labor Party won the right to govern, taking over from the Liberal/National party coalition, one of the most misrepresented statistics I have seen bandied around is:

70% of voters did not vote for a Labor Government.

At a surface level that's true give or take a percentage point depending on the final count of the primary votes (primary vote being every voter's first choice in our preferential voting system). However the people who are holding this statement up (notably the so-called 'Freedom Parties') for validation of the claim that the majority of Australians don't want a Labor government are grossly misrepresenting the Australian people.

Using myself as an example, I put The Greens as my first choice, knowing full well they have next to no chance of forming a government. I'm most aligned with The Greens in terms of their policies and ideology and I like to support them on the off chance there's a Green swing in my electorate - extremely unlikely. 

However if any candidate gets above 4% of the primary vote in an election they become eligible for government election funding to support their future campaigns. So it's not a complete waste of time to vote for your preferred minor party/candidate, even if they don't win their seat. Maybe next election they will. The Greens have won seats. In fact, this election has been one of their best results, so it's not totally out of the question in my electorate.

Want to guess what my second preference was?

Labor. Of the major parties, Labor is who I'm most aligned with.

Take a guess at my third preference...

Liberal. Yes, given a choice, I would rather have kept our current Prime Minister/government than give any preferences to the remaining minor 'freedom' parties.

I'm fairly certain plenty of people may have voted with the strategy of putting their preferred minor party first, and then putting their preferred major party higher in the mix than any other minor party.

The Freedom Parties

I'm not 100% clear on which of the minor parties would call themselves the 'Freedom' parties but I am kind of sure they include One Nation and the United Australia Party as the two largest candidates. At least those are the two I've paid more attention to over the last year. More so than The Greens for that matter because those two parties spend so much time complaining, nit picking, calling everything out they don't like, and generally sounding like awful people.

These parties (all of them, not just the two I mentioned above) combined barely got 15% of the primary vote.

Naturally their supporters are claiming the election, while not rigged, certainly had some suspect goings at many of polling booths, from volunteers giving incorrect voting instructions, to preferences being distributed incorrectly during the count (after receiving suspect phone calls from the Australian Electoral Commission who are obviously corrupt). Let's also not forget that polling booths distribute pencils to fill in your form, so you know someone during the count is going to break out an eraser.

What is most laughable is calls by these voters to do away with preferential voting (which is so confusing a concept, understanding that you can rank candidates from your favorite to least favorite) and give voters just one vote for one party/candidate.

In this election if it was just one vote per person the Liberal/National Coalition government would have won. From all the rhetoric I heard from the Freedom parties, that would be the absolute worst possible outcome. A change of government is actually a very minor win for their campaigns.

70% of Voters Didn't Vote for a Labor Government

If you're a Freedom Party supporter (or you're an elected member from one of these parties) you can sure has hell hold the incoming Labor Government to task by saying 70% of voters didn't vote for a Labor Government. You're not wrong.

The thing is, 85% of voters didn't vote for the freedom parties first. Not a single freedom party got more than 5% of the primary vote. That's pretty much 95% of voters did not vote for your party either.

30% of voters did vote for a Labor Government first. Enough people put Labor high enough in their preferences to allow them to win the election. At the very least, 51% (maybe more in the final count) of Australians would 'prefer' a Labor Government to a Liberal/National coalition, Greens, or any Freedom Party candidate.

The primary vote is not the whole story of Australian elections. Preferences matter and should never be ignored. Particularly not in the post election summary.

Comments

Buy Gifts and Apparel featuring art by TET.

Popular posts from this blog

TV Series Review: Skeleton Crew (2024) (Disney+) *No Spoilers*

I f you saw the trailer for  Skeleton Crew  and decided the show looked too much like Star Wars for little kids, and didn't watch, you missed out on a real treat. While I will say this show was definitely targeted at bringing in younger fans to the Star Wars universe, it is very much more like family viewing than kids only TV. Not to mention, characters are literally gunned down or murdered on this show, but without the really graphic violence you might see on a more adult orientated show. It's actually no more kid only orientated than the first series of Stranger Things  (2016), or even the original  Star Wars  (1977) movie. In fact the whole show is a not so subtle homage to original Star Wars (1977), Treasure Island  (1950), and eighties movies like The Goonies  (1985), ET  (1982), Explorers  (1985) and others. The plot is very straight forward. A group of children, living in the Star Wars equivalent of the suburbs, find an aband...

TV Series Review: Creature Commandos (2024) *No Spoilers*

O fficially, Creature Commandos is the first show of James Gunn's kind of reboot of the DCU. Technically though, it starts with James Gunn's, The Suicide Squad , and includes his series, Peacemaker , as the events of both are either referenced or felt within the show. Potentially that means Margot Robbie is Harley Quinn in the DCU, but I'd be surprised if she would even want another crack at it, let alone that James didn't recast the role. However that's a whole other rabbit hole for a character that may not appear again for at least a few more years. Creature Commandos is Suicide Squad but with monsters, and no real threat of Suicide - well, having your head blown off if you stray from the mission at least. Though I don't recall that being a thing in Gunn's Suicide Squad movie since the team was renamed 'Task Force X'? Amanda Waller (Viola Davis) somehow still has a job, but is no longer allowed to use humans on her team, so she assembles a team of...

I'm Confused About Why People Prefer to Say Discombobulated?

D iscombobulated. Is a word that I think someone rediscovered about three or four years ago (maybe more because the pandemic years have thrown out my sense of time) and now I hear it a lot. It's not a new word by any means, but when I started hearing multiple celebrities using it in everyday sentences, I actively had to look up what it meant. Define it with as many synonyms as you like but essentially it's just another word meaning 'confused'. Seinfeld Quotes: Quotes.net The words are pretty much interchangeable. He was discombobulated by too many choices. He was confused by too many choices.  My confusion is the length of the word. It's unnecessarily long with too many syllables. There are many other words that mean confused, and therefore also mean discombobulated. Most of them are shorter and easier to say. So why not just say 'confused'? Perhaps discombobulated sounds more intelligent, maybe?  Hawaii Five-0 Quotes: Quotes.net I've noticed it gets us...

Meanwhile, In Australia... The World's Most Boring Government Is Fine... We're All Fine.

That's um... What's his name? T o be honest, I stopped following politics in Australia years ago. The only time I check in is usually around election time just to see which set of woke lefty independents, I'm going to vote for, ahead of my fallbacks of the Greens, and then Labor. Despite my sister trying to categorise me as more of a 'left brained' person I definitely lean 'right brained' more at home with my cry baby, woke, alphabet, lefty people. (For the record, if this is the first musing of mine you've ever read, I'm a straight white male who identifies as an artist... Male artist - just in case you were thinking artist is some new kind of gender you hadn't heard of). This year is an election year for our Federal Government, potentially the world's most boring government, for no other reason than during its entire term, if you asked me who was our Prime Minister I'd actually have to stop and think for a moment. Maybe our 31st PM shou...

The Path to Becoming a Successful Visual Artist Selling Work for Thousands, or Even Millions of Dollars

I'm calling this, 'Stand Up Comedian'. Image by Leonardo.ai and TET. I  consider myself to be a successful working artist. I use the term 'working' quite loosely but basically what I mean is I work for myself, I earn money from my art or knowledge, and most of my time I can create art that interests me. I've never been motivated to be a 'career' artist. By that I mean, an artist whose work is displayed in all the top galleries, and that the super rich buy as more of an investment for wealth, than a love of art. Which is not to say these investors don't love art but when you're buying a single artwork for thousands, or even millions, of dollars, you're generally looking for a return on that investment too. That said, I'm not opposed to artists who want that kind of recognition. Certainly, if you're prepared to do the work, in countries like Australia, you can earn a nice passive income off the secondary market. Which means each time yo...

Introducing the Second Sunday Skateboard Sessions - Doing Less to Skateboard More

This was my second heelflip attempt of the day. I was pleased I at least got the full rotation even if I didn't land it. I  am determined to keep skating for as long as possible, though, since my last post in May 2024, about reigniting my kickflip battle at age 54 , I've probably been skateboarding less than I had hoped. Still haven't landed that elusive kickflip either. Strangely I've been wanting to film myself skateboarding again but have been reluctant to do so because it can be a bit of a hassle trying to create interesting content, not to mention a lot of editing, if you want to capture the full journey of learning a trick. I really hate editing. Looking at my camera equipment the other day I was thinking what is the most minimal setup that I can put together that would make it easy to film skate videos anywhere? I landed on using my Samsung A13, Android phone, mounted on a GoPro selfie stick that has a tripod base in the handle, and a wireless mic I bought some t...

Squeezing the Toothpaste: A Metaphor

I remember when toothpaste was sold in a metal tube. Back then, as a child, you'd cop it from Mum or Dad if you squeezed the tube anywhere but from the bottom. You could even buy special keys that would wind the toothpaste tube up from the bottom so you could get every last bit of paste - no wastage. Then along came the plastic tubes. Finally you could squeeze anywhere and the tube would retain its shape - or so they said in the sales pitch. For the most part this was true. It wasn't as much of a problem squeezing the new plastic tube from the top. Squeezing toothpaste from the tube was now easy - or so you thought. The thing about squeezing the tube from the top (or even the middle) is that it leaves some of the paste at the bottom. Eventually you do have to spend extra time pushing the paste from the bottom up into the top of the tube. Not like the old days when squeezing from the bottom meant you got just the right amount of paste and the tube was always ready for the next p...